|
Conspiracy Theories and Granfalloons
from "Settle It Now Negotiation Blog" by
Victoria Pynchon

Every seasoned trial lawyer knows that in the absence of
critical information, juries simply make stuff up to fill in the gaps. They, and
we, do this semi-consciously and reflexively.
Psychologists tell us that we are not only "meaning making" beings,
but that we are all born conspiracy theorists. Viewing a field of nonsensical,
unrelated data, we naturally begin to "connect the dots" - to organize
the information into a coherent, and often compelling, narrative.
Pattern making or conspiracy theorizing is a human survival mechanism. We have
never been the fastest or the biggest creatures on the planet. We don't have the
sharpest teeth or blend in all that well with the scenery. Our soft, easily
punctured skin is not covered with a protective shell. In a pinch, we can't take
a running leap and fly away from land-bound carnivores who might make us their
prey.
We are, however, the canniest creatures on the planet. To avoid the tiger who
made lunch of our best comrade, we surveyed the scene and committed the pattern
of otherwise unrelated details to memory. Five banyan trees, a narrow
stream, and, a pile of rubble left by a recent avalanche means "there are
tigers here."
Couple this with Fundamental
Attribution Error ("FAE") and you have all of the ingredients
necessary to blame inadvertently caused harm on elaborate conspiracies cooked up
by our untrustworthy companions -- FAE being our universal tendency to
over-emphasize the role of others' negative personality traits to explain why
harm befell us.
So it is with our legal adversaries. Once the channels of communication have
been severed by the filing of a lawsuit, attorneys and clients alike begin to
make up "what really happened" based upon predispositions; scattered
conversations; faulty memories; and, scraps of documentation.
The case at issue was a costly but relatively simple lemon law dispute. The
Plaintiffs, Kirk Townsend and John Finn (names changed of course), had purchased
a mobile home, driven it a few hundred miles, and, taken it in for service on
four occasions. They wanted to return the RV to the manufacturer and get their
money back.
Though the defense brief never used the word "gay," their theory was
apparent. Two frivolous gay men must have purchased this expensive ($200,000)
mobile home on a whim, changed their minds and were now seeking any excuse to
get rid of a vehicle they too hastily purchased. Whether the motor home met the
lemon law tests for rescission was not the focus of the defense. The buyer's
regret story -- arrived at in all apparent good faith -- had firmly lodged
itself in the minds of the defense team and they were little inclined to make
concessions.
Meeting Kirk and John in separate caucus revealed a quite different scenario.
Kirk was a Viet Nam veteran and life-long motor home enthusiast. An engineer by
profession, he was an auto mechanic by avocation. He and John had been domestic
partners for twenty-five years. John sported a crew-cut and wore a plaid flannel
shirt. Everything about these two men in their late fifties challenged the
televised "Will and Grace" stereotypes.
Unable to dislodge the gay buyer's regret theory from the defense
psyche, I asked the parties to sit down and talk. I coached Kirk and John to
make their narrative short and non-rancorous and recommended to the defense that
they take a "customer satisfaction; we want to hear your story"
approach.
It was not, however, my coaching or my intervention that broke impasse that day.
It was the conversation between defense counsel and Kirk.
"You're a veteran?" defense counsel asked Kirk as he slid into the
chair at the conference table.
"Army," said Kirk. "I was in Saigon just before the Tet
Offensive."
"Really?" defense counsel asked, leaning forward with genuine
interest. "I was in Saigon then too. Do you remember the X Bar at the end
of Y Street?"
For the more cynically minded, this is called a granfalloon,
a term coined by Kurt Vonnegut in Cat's Cradle. It is defined as a group of
people who outwardly choose or claim to have a shared identity or purpose, but
whose mutual association is actually meaningless. The most common granfalloons
are associations and societies based on a shared but ultimately fabricated
premise. As examples, Vonnegut cites: "the Communist Party, the Daughters
of the American Revolution, the General Electric Company, the International
Order of Odd Fellows -- and any nation, anytime, anywhere."
For the less cynical, this is simply a very quick way in which we establish
friendly connections among strangers -- in which patterns of unrelated and
perhaps meaningless detail say "home" rather than "danger
here." In this case, the granfalloon of service in Saigon before the Tet
Offensive had the effect of breaking down the gay stereotypes on which the
defense "buyer's remorse" theory rested. As the prejudices crumbled,
so did suspicions of a bad faith claim. When the parties once again repaired to
their separate corners, the offers and counter-offers came quickly and without
great resistance.
I tell this story to illustrate once again the power of face to face
conversations to resolve a conflict that appears to be solely about money. Here,
the power inherent in the shared experiences of two strangers -- defense counsel
and Kirk -- was far more profound than the predispositions and subtle but
compelling stereotypes that were causing impasse.
About The Author
Victoria Pynchon: Judicate West Panelist (www.adjudicateinc.com) 25 years complex
commercial litigation and trial experience; instructor, National Institute for
Trial Advocacy and Anderson School of Business, U.C.L.A. Entrepreneurship
Institute (Summer 2006 - Negotiation Seminar); J.D. U.C. Davis, Order of the
Coif; LLM. Straus Institute for Dispute Resolution; Federal District and
Superior Court Panelist; Extensive Co-Mediation Experience with Judges Alexander
Williams, III and Victoria Chaney of the L.A. Superior and L.A. Complex
Litigation Courts, respectively. For full profile see http://www.settlenow.com. See
her mediation blog "Settle It Now Negotiation Blog" at http://settleitnow.blogspot.com/.
Disclaimer

|